Sex & Relationships

15 Alternative Dating Apps To Tinder

Our verdict on the phone apps that will help you find love.
IMAGE GETTY IMAGES
Comments

Whether you love or loathe Tinder, there is no denying it has changed online dating forever.

As a result, there is now no end of apps with the same aim of helping you fall in love and live happily ever after, or at the least find someone to hang out with next weekend.

Whether it's matching you on your favorite interests or finding someone who you share mutual friends with. Here, we take the biggest alternatives to Tinder and give them a spin to find out what (if anything) they do differently and what sets them apart.

Hinge

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Match with your pal's pals (on Facebook).

CONTINUE READING BELOW
Recommended Videos

Pros: The brashness. If you actively pursue a date on Hinge, discretion mustn't be an issue—your friends are bound to find out. This means having a handy mutual connection to discuss or slag off when you meet up for drinks.

Cons: It's all a little too close to home: what's to stop her feeding your dating tekkers back to your pal? It could make future beers with your mates a little awkward.

Verdict: This app allows you to eliminate the middleman. If you lack inhibition, Hinge could throw the door wide open.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Badoo

Photo by BADOO.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: With more than 400 million members, Badoo is one of the world's most popular dating apps and part of the same umbrella company as Bumble. On it, users upload a picture of a celebrity or famous figure they fancy and the app serves up members who look similar.

Pros: It's a non-swiping app and allows you a smaller pool of potential dates tailored to your taste.

Cons: Just because someone looks like Tom Hardy or Jessica Alba doesn't mean they will behave like them.

Verdict: If you've got very specific tastes Badoo might work for you but fancying someone because they look like a celebrity is so rarely how attraction works.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Guardian Soulmates

Photo by GUARDIAN.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: As one of the longest standing dating sites on the internet, The Guardian’s Soulmates service doesn’t need to prove its credentials. Perhaps that’s why it’s one of the only apps that requires a paid subscription to fully utilize (and at £35/month, it doesn’t come cheap.)

So what are you getting for that money? None of the bells and whistles that we’ve come to expect from modern dating apps, that’s for sure. This is a back-to-basics service that relies on its like-minded and loyal user base (more than 80 percent of members read the Guardian, and unlike many dating apps men only slightly outnumber women). It also offers regular singles events for users, a regularly updated Soulmates blog and a highly refined search function.

Pros: A strong reputation and compatible crowd

Cons: Not as innovative or packed with features as newer dating apps.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Verdict: Worth the money if sitting in the pub on a Sunday quietly reading The Observer is one of your kinks.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Coffee Meets Bagel

The USP: Their mantra and methodology is explained thus: "Each day at noon, guys will receive up to 21 quality matches—known as 'Bagels.' They are given the option to either LIKE or PASS. Then, Coffee Meets Bagel will curate the best potential matches for women among the men who expressed interest."

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Pros: A more curated selection than just endlessly swiping through everyone.

Cons: The app requires you to give over control over to someone else to decide for you.

Verdict: CMB only lets you see people who have liked you, so no torturing yourself about 'the one that got away.' Think of it as a time-effective dating app.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Down

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Gives you the chance to tell your friends (rather than strangers) that you want to sleep with them.

Pros: There is a strange thrill in being able to 'swipe' that acquaintance you've always fancied, asking them for a date (up) or telling them you want to sleep with them (down). Until you realize how pathetic it is.

Cons: It pulls in every single woman who happens to be your friend on Facebook, even if they haven't joined Down yet (your cowardly come on will be waiting for them if they ever do), making it rather pointless.

Verdict: The more you think about it, the less sense Down makes. Isn't the whole point of internet dating that you can meet someone new? This hook-up app for friends (and friends of friends) is the equivalent of passing 'I Like You' notes in class.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Happn

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Hook up with the people you walk past on the street.

Pros: Once you get over the slight stalker complex Happn instills on you by showing women who walked past your front door an hour ago, matching with users within a 250-meter radius is actually quite handy. Chances are you live or work in the same area, so arranging a date becomes a lot simpler.

Cons: If the date goes horribly, there are no assurances you won't bump into her when you're buying milk a few days later. Also, spend too much time on it and you start getting paranoid you're seeing 'someone you liked on Happn' every time you sit in your local cafe.

Verdict: One of the most effective—and convenient—dating apps out there. Until it isn't.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

OKCupid

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Endless personality quiz questions that give you a match percentage with would-be partners.

Pros: You can weed out people with traits or points of view you find simply unacceptable. Racists, bigots, and Mumford & Sons fans, then.

Cons: Too many basic functions are restricted to a paid membership.

Verdict: Worth a shot, if only to kill time answering bizarre questions about yourself.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Plenty Of Fish

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: It's a huge ocean, with more members than any of the others (around 70 million).

Pros: Unlike most of the other apps, doing the basics on PoF—looking at profiles, sending and reading messages—is absolutely free.

Cons: A high number of sexually frustrated virgin-trolls means a lot of women find using it a harrowing experience, which understandably makes them cagey when you, a normal man, comes along. It's disheartening how many women have to resort to 'please no sex pests' appendices on their profile information.

Verdict: Easy to navigate, simple and free to use, void of distracting gimmicks. And unlike Tinder, users tend to write a bit about themselves, meaning you have more to go on (and sell yourself with) than just your five least-worst selfies.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Grindr

Photo by GRINDR.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: It really works. If you happen to be gay, bisexual or curious.

Pros: Easy and efficient to use, you can find a hookup within minutes.

Cons: It is notoriously 'glitchy,' with messages disappearing and some functions not working properly.

Verdict: The app that started it all, Grindr has been helping men who like men improve their sex lives since 2009. Whether they are honest about it or not, every heterosexual internet dating app out there aspires to be the 'Grindr for straight people.' Has it happened yet? Not even close.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Lumen

Photo by LUMEN.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Dating for over-50s.

Pros: Most (if not all) dating apps provide age boundaries, but Lumen is the first dedicated service for people over the age of 50, with a verification system that keeps bots and scammers at bay.

Cons: Not a lot of search filter options. All opening messages must feature more than 50 characters, which means you can't rely on the tried-and-tested "Wazzzuuuppp?!?!"

Verdict: A simple interface, strong security focus, and growing community means that Lumen's future is bright for this mature dating app.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Inner Circle

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Members are vetted, and they also run IRL singles events.

Pros: The screening process ensures out-and-out perverts are banished, which means everyone wins (except the perverts). The fun and well-organized events means membership feels a bit more like a club, and less like pin-balling around a vast galaxy of random singletons.

Cons: After sending someone a message, you're notified when they're checking your profile, which means you can actually see yourself being rejected in real-time. But hey, that's life.

Verdict: Pulling together the best elements of other older dating apps, Inner Circle is the best all-rounder out there with the highest quantity of people you'd actually like to meet. £5 a week for the advanced user options is just too much, though.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Bumble

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USP: Like Tinder, except once you match, only the ladies can make the first move and say hello.

Pros: It means women have an extra barrier against the 'hey wanna fuk??' brigade, which is good for all concerned. It also means if she's got in touch with you, you definitely weren't an 'accidental swipe,' meaning you'll be leaving less of those unanswered hellos that slowly chip away at your soul.

Cons: None, really. Though one minor gripe is that Bumble's algorithm clearly pulls ten of the highest-rated profiles to the top of your feed every time you log in. Parading the hottest—and least obtainable—women in front of your face every time you log in feels a little bit manipulative.

Verdict: A dating app where women need not fear to tread, and where the sting of rejection is largely removed for you. Win-win.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Luxy

The USP: Connect with verified millionaires.

Pros: The site boasts a large portfolio of high earners and offers 24/7 customer service for its members.

Cons: Sadly, you also need to be a millionaire. People tend to upload shots of their huge houses.

Verdict: Aside from the obviously Dickensian classism all over the site, it also has an understandably odd mixture of trust fund brats and retired divorcees. Luxy does, however, offer high security to protect your privacy and weeds out people looking for a sugar daddy or mommy.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Muddy Matches

Photo by MUDDY MATCHES.

The USP: It's a dating service for countryside lovers, rather than people who don't bathe.

Pros: You don't actually have to live in the countryside. You just need to be into the rural scene. Rambling, jodhpurs, chortling, wax gilets, shoveling poo. All that good stuff.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Cons: Full membership (which allows you to send messages) comes in at £94/year.

Verdict: No other app can guarantee you a weekly polo tutorial. For that, it's worth the yearly fee.

ITUNES GOOGLE PLAY

Tastebuds

Photo by TASTEBUDS.FM.

The USP: Fall in love with someone who shares your music taste.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Pros: A nice way to connect with people on something you're passionate about, or it can be used to find friends to visit gigs with.

Cons: Just because you both like Kings of Leon doesn't really mean you're made for each other.

Verdict: A nice concept and considering music is a personal passion that connects a lot of people, Tastebuds actually has more of a USP than most niche interest apps. However the same warnings apply—you may be looking for your dream girl who loves Ok Computer, but you're going to end up with a page of middle-aged Radiohead loving blokes like yourself.

ITUNES

This story originally appeared on Esquire.co.uk. Minor edits have been made by the Esquiremag.ph editors.

Comments
View More Articles About:
Comments
Connect With Us