How 'Obsession' Weaponizes the Lonely Man
We fear the cringe that comes with rejection more than rejection itself

by JV Ordoñez
Published on Jun 8, 2026
Warning: This essay contains spoilers for Obsession (2026) by Curry Barker
Curry Barker's Obsession doesn't reinvent the wheel or present a drastically revolutionary narrative in the horror genre, but it makes for a remarkably uneasy watch because it taps into a perennial and ever-relevant fear for the modern man: loneliness and the terror of rejection.
The low-hanging fruit about the film is that it's a lot like that one Fairly Odd Parents episode where Timmy Turner wished that he and Trixie Tang (we love the Marvel-like alliterations, Butch Hartmann) were the last two people on earth. Barker's piece pretty much parallels the cartoon to a certain extent, with heavy helpings of an unhinged femme fatale trope cranked to 11 and feeding their boyfriend his dead cat for lunch.
A plot involving a wish gone wrong is pretty much derivative at this point, but what sets this YouTuber-directed film apart is the cast knocking it out of the park with their believability and their capacity to ooze toxicity and selfishness via their respective roles.
You've probably heard the statistics by now. Adult Gen Z aren't having sex as much as previous generations and aren't going out clubbing as much anymore, preferring instead to live in their own heads and couch potato it up. Data from the Institute for Family Studies shows that sexlessness among young adults aged 18 to 24 has risen by roughly 40 percent from 32 percent, largely thanks to a paradox of hyper-connected isolation, social anxiety, and an astounding amount of time scrolling their worries away.
The algorithms and the feeds on our screens usually exacerbate a disillusionment with love and desire altogether, and this is exactly what drives Bear to be swallowed up by his own limerence with his coworker Nikki.
But the film's real horror has less to do with loneliness as a passive condition and more to do with what loneliness metastasizes into when a man decides he'd rather manufacture desire than risk the humiliation of asking for it honestly. Bear doesn't confess his feelings to Nikki so much as he skirts the entire question by buying a supernatural toy that forces her to fall in love with him, which means the horror of watching Nikki's infatuation curdle into something possessive and monstrous has nothing to do with the wish going wrong. The wish, at its core, was always the problem.
That's what keeps Obsession from collapsing into a straightforward parable about sad men. Barker is far more interested in the consent-avoidance living underneath the loneliness, the specific fantasy of love without the vulnerability of pursuit and connection without the possibility of rejection, and he literalizes it without ever fully letting Bear off the hook for wanting it in the first place.
The Capacity of a Film to Bother You
This is where we're getting at with modern horror movies, even with the Mia Goth X trilogy: it's about evoking something sinister or supernaturally disconcerting from an innately human condition such as an addiction to control.
"Something that's more scary than traditional is uncomfortable. I am always chasing that uncomfortability. If I can make you feel weird, that's more exciting to me than if I can just make a loud noise to scare you," Barker earlier told Esquire India.
Take Pearl (2022), for example, which Navarrette has cited as a major inspiration for Nikki's overall creepiness; it's all about a fixation that consumes the character's humanity throughout the story's progression. Goth's character is hell-bent on escaping her mundane rural life to become a Hollywood movie star, and the severe repression caused by her traditional upbringing leads her to murderous intent and rampage. In this case, the titular villain's isolation is a more clear-cut culprit, against Bear's one seemingly innocent wish that he didn't actually think would come true.
While not as inherently violent in his methods, Bear resorts to making peace with the synthetic relationship he manufactured, blaming a so-called demonic force for taking away the real Nikki as a way of coping with the entire debacle. Barker himself has been clear in interviews that there is no demonic force piloting Nikki's body. It's purely the careless wish amplifying whatever feelings she already had for Bear to ungodly proportions, which raises the question of whether she actually liked him from the start or was simply dreading that awkwardness of what most women in her position eventually have to deal with: losing another friendship because of unrequited infatuation.
We can't forget that Nikki was an aspiring writer, a detail easy to lose sight of once the film shifts into horror territory. The only thing she had her sights set on was feeling real love in order to write a truly great love story, not a romance as Bear naively assumed. Bear had spent considerable time hopelessly pining after her through obsessive social media stalking and grandiose gift-giving but buckled under the pressure of being honest with the girl of his dreams, which at its core is a reflection of what most young men grapple with daily.
And this is where Sarah comes in, functioning as the film's quiet counterargument to everything Bear tells himself about why he can't just be honest with Nikki. Her feelings for Bear are straightforwardly real, which makes her the precise antithesis of Nikki's sufficiently ambiguous warmth, the kind of warmth that gives Bear just enough runway to sustain a fantasy that eventually curdles into carnal desire acted on without any genuine reciprocity on Nikki's part. Sarah offers him something mutual and legible, and he walks straight past it (the direction in which her face is smashed in by Freaky Nikki), which is where the film makes its most damning case against him, because he has an exit from his isolation right in front of him and actively chooses the fantasy over it anyway.
As Barker himself says, voicing the One Wish Willow customer service rep with the flat affect of someone who has had this conversation too many times before: "Just because you made it happen doesn't mean it isn't real," a line that cuts both ways, since Nikki's manufactured devotion is real in its consequences just as much as Sarah's overlooked sincerity is real in its quiet, ignored existence.
Barker has been criticized for constantly pulling the curtain back on what the film is really about since it defeats the purpose of leaving things up to interpretation and letting the viewer's mind wander on who is really to blame for the skin-crawling scenes they chose to sit through. We don't really think he missed the point of his own film, since the ambiguity was never really the thesis to begin with. It's about living with what you wish for and what getting everything you wanted actually entails, a persistent loneliness that slowly burrows into a man's skin long after the credits roll.

Esquire PH's resident music scribe, wristwatch disciple, and essayist fluent in niche internet subcultures and Philippine politics.