Arts & Entertainment

'Titanic' Director James Cameron Explains Why Jack Had to Die

So stop bugging him about the size of the door.
IMAGE Paramount Pictures
Comments

Titanic director James Cameron has dismissed the theory that Jack could have survived by climbing onto the door with Rosecalling it "silly" because the character was going to die, no matter what.

Leonardo DiCaprio's Jack succumbed to hypothermia at the end of the epic disaster movie, but when asked why Rose (Kate Winslet) didn't make room for her love interest, Cameron was firm in his response.

"The answer is very simple," he told Vanity Fair, "because it says on page 147 [of the script] that Jack dies. Very simple.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

"Obviously it was an artistic choice, the thing was just big enough to hold her, and not big enough to hold him...I think it's all kind of silly, really, that we're having this discussion 20 years later. But it does show that the film was effective in making Jack so endearing to the audience that it hurts them to see him die."

"Had he lived, the ending of the film would have been meaningless.

"The film is about death and separation; he had to die. So whether it was that, or whether a smoke stack fell on him, he was going down. It's called art, things happen for artistic reasons, not for physics reasons."


ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

And even if you wanted to dissect the buoyancy of the door, Cameron isn't having it.

"I was in the water with the piece of wood putting people on it for about two days getting it exactly buoyant enough so that it would support one person with full free-board, meaning that she wasn't immersed at all in the 28-degree water, so that she could survive the three hours it took until the rescue ship got there," he said.

"[Jack] didn't know that she was gonna get picked up by a lifeboat an hour later; he was dead anyway.

"And we very, very finely tuned it to be exactly what you see in the movie because I believed at the time, and still do, that that's what it would have taken for one person to survive."

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

That's that, then.

(Incidentally, it's not the first time Cameron has been asked about the subject, either.)

From: Digital Spy

This story originally appeared on Esquire.co.uk.

* Minor edits have been made by the Esquiremag.ph editors.

Comments
View More Articles About:
About The Author
Ben Lee
View Other Articles From Ben
Comments
Latest Feed
 
Share
The pair stepped out in a masterful, almost-matching pair of outfits.
 
Share
How one of the most powerful class of Filipinos came to an end
 
Share
The country’s premiere state university has been witness to many stories of love and friendship not only in real life, but also on-screen.
 
Share
The Ozone tragedy happened in 1996, ironically during Fire Prevention Month.
 
Share
The Social Security System will implement the new schedule in April 2019.
 
Share
The Lane for Express Application was launched early this month.
 
Share
When the world’s most valuable company sets its sights on a product category, you can bet it will never be the same, just as Apple did to the smart watch with the introduction of the Apple Watch.
 
Share
 
Share
Joefel Manlod now owns one of the fastest-growing coffee solutions providers in Mindanao.
 
Share
The site has seen a 30 percent traffic drop since its "adult content ban" in December.
 
Share
The laid back comedy king is looking better than ever
Load More Articles
Connect With Us